PubMed
Retatrutide, a GIP, GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonist, for people with type 2 diabetes
Rosenstock et al., 2023
LY3437943
Retatrutide (LY3437943) is Eli Lilly's triple GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor agonist in Phase III clinical trials. The TRIUMPH-4 trial (December 2025) achieved 28.7% average weight loss (71.2 lbs from a 248.5 lb baseline) at 68 weeks with 12mg — the highest weight loss efficacy recorded for any obesity medication to date. It is not FDA-approved. FDA has stated it cannot be lawfully compounded under 503A/503B.
Overall check-ins
Trackers & reports
Overview
Retatrutide (LY3437943) is Eli Lilly's triple GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor agonist in Phase III clinical trials. The TRIUMPH-4 trial (December 2025) achieved 28.7% average weight loss (71.2 lbs from a 248.5 lb baseline) at 68 weeks with 12mg — the highest weight loss efficacy recorded for any obesity medication to date. It is not FDA-approved. FDA has stated it cannot be lawfully compounded under 503A/503B.
Community
From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.
Favorable 99% · Mixed 1% · Unfavorable overall 0%
Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.
Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.
Median bucket: 2–3 mg · Most common: 1–2 mg
Reports span 0 to ≥ 5 mg (open-ended top bucket)
Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.
Among repeat reporters, 100% said they felt similar to their last entry, 0% more positive, and 0% more negative.
Overall, repeat reporters leaned similar or mixed compared to their previous entry.
Median gap between entries: 51 days · Based on 45 repeat reporters
Research
PubMed
Rosenstock et al., 2023
PubMed
Jastreboff et al., 2023
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov, 2024
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov, 2024
PubMed
Jastreboff et al., 2023
PubMed
Katsi et al., 2025
Tools
More ways to learn about Retatrutide from observational PeptIQ data.
Compare with
Related peptides
Help
This page summarizes 125 anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users who track Retatrutide, including commonly reported effects and co-tracked peptides. These are observational patterns, not clinical outcomes.
PeptIQ separates overall check-in ratings (favorable, mixed, or unfavorable) from logged side effects like nausea or fatigue. Users often report benefits and side effects in the same check-in — a high experience score does not mean zero side effects were noted.
6 sources are linked on this page, including PubMed articles, clinical trial registries, and FDA labels where applicable. Citations describe published research — not recommendations.
This wiki does not assess safety or recommend use. Retatrutide is listed as Phase 3. Consult a licensed clinician for personal medical decisions.
This wiki summarizes observational community reports and linked citations for Retatrutide. It does not assert therapeutic benefits. See the cited research list on this page and the educational profile for Retatrutide for study-level context — not medical advice.
Retatrutide is listed in PeptIQ as Phase 3. Regulatory status varies by jurisdiction and can change. This wiki does not provide legal advice; check current FDA and local rules and talk with a licensed clinician or counsel for personal decisions.
Safety data quality for Retatrutide varies widely by compound and study design. PeptIQ does not establish a risk profile here. Review primary literature, product labeling where applicable, and clinician guidance. Community self-reports are not a substitute for clinical evidence.
This page links 6 indexed sources for Retatrutide. Evidence maturity differs by application — some peptides have large human programs, others are mostly preclinical. Treat citation counts as literature volume, not proof of efficacy.