Claim-level evidence grades · Min 3 claims

Who backs peptide claims with science?

Rankings score audited claims against published research — not people. Share the boards. Challenge weak claims. Celebrate careful educators.

Rankings reflect claim-level evidence grades from PeptIQ audits — not character judgments. Creators may request a review via Right of Reply. Educational use only; not medical advice. Methodology · Right of reply

What these claims actually are

We separate claims into three buckets: backed by evidence, factually incorrect, and grey — like animal-only findings sold as human fact (e.g. BPC-157 “fixes Achilles” from rat studies).

Evidence-based

35%

67 claims

Claims that align with published human or clinical evidence at the stated strength.

Ex: “Semaglutide can reduce body weight in adults with obesity” — supported by large RCTs.

Factually incorrect

0%

0 claims

Claims that conflict with the evidence, invent certainty, or omit critical safety/context in a misleading way.

Ex: “Peptides have no side effects” — contradicts known adverse-event profiles.

Grey / overstated

65%

127 claims

Plausible direction but wrong certainty — animal-only data sold as human fact, dose/effect overstated, or no adequate published support yet.

Ex: “BPC-157 fixes Achilles tears” — often rests on rodent tendon models, not proven human Achilles repair trials.

Evidence mix

Share of audited claims in each bucket

Loading…
BackedIncorrectGrey

Verdict detail

Grey splits into overstated (wrong certainty) vs no published support

Loading…

Claims over time

Stacked by bucket as audits land — plus the running evidence grade

Loading…

Gold line = running science evidence grade (Supported + ½ Overstated ÷ total claims).

Highest evidence grades

Accounts whose audited claims most often match published science

Needs stronger evidence

Lowest claim-level evidence grades — not a judgment of the person

Priority watchlist

High-reach peptide voices not yet scored — paste a post to start an audit

@joerogan

Joe Rogan · Podcast amplifier — BPC-157 mentions

Awaiting audit

@jaycampbell333

Jay Campbell · Hormone optimization / BioLongevity Labs

Awaiting audit

@nylenayga

Nyle Nayga · Hypertrophy / PED frank talk

Awaiting audit

@drtyna

Dr. Tyna Moore · GLP-1 microdosing / regenerative

Awaiting audit

@samson_dauda

Samson Dauda · IFBB Pro / Marek athlete

Awaiting audit

@bengreenfieldfitness

Ben Greenfield · Biohacking / longevity peptides

Awaiting audit

@tonyhuge

Tony Huge · PED / peptide self-experimentation

Awaiting audit

@bryanjohnson_

Bryan Johnson · Blueprint longevity experiments

Awaiting audit

@vigoroussteve

Vigorous Steve · Harm-reduction / pharmacology

Awaiting audit

@dramykillen

Dr. Amy Killen · Women's longevity / regenerative

Awaiting audit

@mad_scientist_duffin

Chris Duffin · Strength / long-term peptide user

Awaiting audit

@kylegillettmd

Dr. Kyle Gillett · Hormone / peptide masterclass

Awaiting audit

@jaylaneifbb

Jay Lane · Wolverine stack / IFBB

Awaiting audit

@markhymanmd

Dr. Mark Hyman · Functional medicine / GLP-1 nuance

Awaiting audit

@drmikeisraetel

Dr. Mike Israetel · Sport science / retatrutide takes

Awaiting audit

@nathalieniddam

Nathalie Niddam · Bioregulator peptides

Awaiting audit

@brighambuhler

Brigham Buhler · Ways2Well / clinic founder

Awaiting audit

@clavicular

Clavicular (Braden Peters) · Looksmaxxing / young audience

Awaiting audit

@theanabolicdoc

Dr. Thomas O'Connor · Anabolic Doc / harm reduction

Awaiting audit

@lorrainekamesha

Lorraine Kamesha · GLP-1 patient advocate

Awaiting audit

@koniverwellness

Dr. Craig Koniver · Performance medicine / Huberman guest

Awaiting audit

@drgapin

Dr. Tracy Gapin · Men's health / peptides

Awaiting audit

@dave.asprey

Dave Asprey · Biohacking mainstreamer

Awaiting audit

@thomasdelauer

Thomas DeLauer · Metabolic / GLP-1 adjacent

Awaiting audit

Generated 7/12/2026, 6:05:03 AM · Educational only · Disclaimers