@zaidsexperience
1 post audited · 5 claims analysed
Science evidence grade
Based on 5 claims across 1 audit
0
Supported
0%
0
Overstated
0%
0
Misleading
0%
5
No Evidence
100%
Share this evidence grade
Claim-level evidence grades — not a character judgment. Methodology · Right of reply · Leaderboards
What @zaidsexperience claims actually are
We separate claims into three buckets: backed by evidence, factually incorrect, and grey — like animal-only findings sold as human fact (e.g. BPC-157 “fixes Achilles” from rat studies).
Evidence-based
0%
0 claims
Claims that align with published human or clinical evidence at the stated strength.
Ex: “Semaglutide can reduce body weight in adults with obesity” — supported by large RCTs.
Factually incorrect
0%
0 claims
Claims that conflict with the evidence, invent certainty, or omit critical safety/context in a misleading way.
Ex: “Peptides have no side effects” — contradicts known adverse-event profiles.
Grey / overstated
100%
5 claims
Plausible direction but wrong certainty — animal-only data sold as human fact, dose/effect overstated, or no adequate published support yet.
Ex: “BPC-157 fixes Achilles tears” — often rests on rodent tendon models, not proven human Achilles repair trials.
Evidence mix
Share of audited claims in each bucket
Verdict detail
Grey splits into overstated (wrong certainty) vs no published support
Claims over time
Stacked by bucket as audits land — plus the running evidence grade
Gold line = running science evidence grade (Supported + ½ Overstated ÷ total claims).
Audit history(1 post)
“4 GREAT THINGS ABOUT TURKESTERONE! #turkesterone #gorillamind #4coolthings #turkesteronebenefits #turkesteroneforsize #turkesteroneforfatloss #turkesteroneforbreakingplateau #moreplatesmoredates #supplements #notsponsored #idig”
All five claims about Ecdysterone (Terkesterone) — covering side effects, inter-individual variability, muscle gain, fat loss, and plateau breakthrough — lack published human clinical trial evidence or registered human studies in PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov. While Ecdysterone is a naturally occurring plant compound that has appeared in some preclinical research, no peer-reviewed evidence was found to support any of the specific claims made about its efficacy or safety profile in humans. Without citing studies or pointing to human data, these claims remain scientifically unvalidated.
Audit another post from @zaidsexperience
Paste their Instagram link to add a new audit