GH SecretagoguesResearch OnlyD

CJC-1295 (no DAC)

Modified GRF 1-29

Short-acting CJC/GRF variant used for pulse-style GH protocols.

Observational report only — live community data. Not medical advice. Does not recommend doses, protocols, or treatments.
Studies cited
4
Research grade
D
Experience
56

Overall check-ins

Activity
42

Trackers & reports

Overview

About CJC-1295 (no DAC)

Short-acting CJC/GRF variant used for pulse-style GH protocols.

Category
GH Secretagogues
Regulatory status
Research Only
Also known as
Modified GRF 1-29
Self-reports
81

Community

What 81 users report

81 community reports

Overall experience

From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Favorable 2% · Mixed 98% · Unfavorable overall 0%

Most reported benefits

Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.

Sleep
203

Most logged side effects

Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Headache
198

Self-reported dose per injection

Median bucket: 0.2–0.4 mg · Most common: 0.2–0.4 mg

Reports span 0.05–2 mg

0.05–0.1 mg
12
0.1–0.2 mg
64
0.2–0.4 mg
117
0.4–0.6 mg
5
1–2 mg
5

Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.

How repeat users are trending

Among repeat reporters, 88% said they felt similar to their last entry, 13% more positive, and 0% more negative.

Overall, repeat reporters leaned more positive than their previous entry.

Median gap between entries: 68 days · Based on 32 repeat reporters

Research

Cited research (3)

PubMed

Prolonged stimulation of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I secretion by CJC-1295, a long-acting GH-releasing hormone analog

Teichman et al., 2006

Source
Wiki study page →

PubMed

Advances in the detection of growth hormone releasing hormone synthetic analogs

Memdouh et al., 2021

Source
Wiki study page →

Tools

Explore more

Help

Frequently asked

What do PeptIQ users report about CJC-1295 (no DAC)?

This page summarizes 81 anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users who track CJC-1295 (no DAC), including commonly reported effects and co-tracked peptides. These are observational patterns, not clinical outcomes.

How do side effects relate to overall experience for CJC-1295 (no DAC)?

PeptIQ separates overall check-in ratings (favorable, mixed, or unfavorable) from logged side effects like nausea or fatigue. Users often report benefits and side effects in the same check-in — a high experience score does not mean zero side effects were noted.

What research is cited for CJC-1295 (no DAC)?

3 sources are linked on this page, including PubMed articles, clinical trial registries, and FDA labels where applicable. Citations describe published research — not recommendations.

Is CJC-1295 (no DAC) safe to use?

This wiki does not assess safety or recommend use. CJC-1295 (no DAC) is listed as Research Only. Consult a licensed clinician for personal medical decisions.

What are the purported benefits and uses of CJC-1295 (no DAC)?

This wiki summarizes observational community reports and linked citations for CJC-1295 (no DAC). It does not assert therapeutic benefits. See the cited research list on this page and the educational profile for CJC-1295 (no DAC) for study-level context — not medical advice.

What is the legal status of CJC-1295 (no DAC)?

CJC-1295 (no DAC) is listed in PeptIQ as Research Only. Regulatory status varies by jurisdiction and can change. This wiki does not provide legal advice; check current FDA and local rules and talk with a licensed clinician or counsel for personal decisions.

What are the known or theoretical side effects and risks of CJC-1295 (no DAC)?

Safety data quality for CJC-1295 (no DAC) varies widely by compound and study design. PeptIQ does not establish a risk profile here. Review primary literature, product labeling where applicable, and clinician guidance. Community self-reports are not a substitute for clinical evidence.

What is the current state of research on CJC-1295 (no DAC)?

This page links 3 indexed sources for CJC-1295 (no DAC). Evidence maturity differs by application — some peptides have large human programs, others are mostly preclinical. Treat citation counts as literature volume, not proof of efficacy.