FDA Drug Label
WEGOVY (semaglutide) injection, for subcutaneous use - Prescribing Information
Novo, 2021
Ozempic / Wegovy / Rybelsus
Semaglutide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist developed by Novo Nordisk and FDA-approved as Ozempic (type 2 diabetes, 2017), Wegovy (chronic weight management, 2021), and Rybelsus (oral daily, 2019). STEP 1 clinical trial demonstrated 14.9% average body weight reduction at 68 weeks with 2.4mg weekly. SELECT cardiovascular outcomes trial (2023) showed 20% reduction in major cardiovascular events.
Overall check-ins
Trackers & reports
Overview
Semaglutide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist developed by Novo Nordisk and FDA-approved as Ozempic (type 2 diabetes, 2017), Wegovy (chronic weight management, 2021), and Rybelsus (oral daily, 2019). STEP 1 clinical trial demonstrated 14.9% average body weight reduction at 68 weeks with 2.4mg weekly. SELECT cardiovascular outcomes trial (2023) showed 20% reduction in major cardiovascular events.
Community
From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.
Favorable 4% · Mixed 96% · Unfavorable overall 0%
Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.
Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.
Median bucket: 1–2 mg · Most common: 2–3 mg
Reports span 0 to ≥ 5 mg (open-ended top bucket)
Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.
Among repeat reporters, 78% said they felt similar to their last entry, 22% more positive, and 0% more negative.
Overall, repeat reporters leaned more positive than their previous entry.
Median gap between entries: 94 days · Based on 23 repeat reporters
Research
FDA Drug Label
Novo, 2021
FDA Drug Label
Novo, 2017
PubMed
Wilding et al., 2021
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov, 2024
PubMed
Weghuber et al., 2022
PubMed
Kosiborod et al., 2023
PubMed
Wharton et al., 2022
PubMed
Lincoff et al., 2023
Tools
More ways to learn about Semaglutide from observational PeptIQ data.
Compare with
Related peptides
Help
This page summarizes 26 anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users who track Semaglutide, including commonly reported effects and co-tracked peptides. These are observational patterns, not clinical outcomes.
PeptIQ separates overall check-in ratings (favorable, mixed, or unfavorable) from logged side effects like nausea or fatigue. Users often report benefits and side effects in the same check-in — a high experience score does not mean zero side effects were noted.
8 sources are linked on this page, including PubMed articles, clinical trial registries, and FDA labels where applicable. Citations describe published research — not recommendations.
This wiki does not assess safety or recommend use. Semaglutide is listed as FDA Approved. Consult a licensed clinician for personal medical decisions.
This wiki summarizes observational community reports and linked citations for Semaglutide. It does not assert therapeutic benefits. See the cited research list on this page and the educational profile for Semaglutide for study-level context — not medical advice.
Semaglutide is listed in PeptIQ as FDA Approved. Regulatory status varies by jurisdiction and can change. This wiki does not provide legal advice; check current FDA and local rules and talk with a licensed clinician or counsel for personal decisions.
Safety data quality for Semaglutide varies widely by compound and study design. PeptIQ does not establish a risk profile here. Review primary literature, product labeling where applicable, and clinician guidance. Community self-reports are not a substitute for clinical evidence.
This page links 8 indexed sources for Semaglutide. Evidence maturity differs by application — some peptides have large human programs, others are mostly preclinical. Treat citation counts as literature volume, not proof of efficacy.