Compare

LL-37 vs NAD+

Side-by-side observational reports from PeptIQ users. This compares self-reported patterns — not clinical head-to-head trials.

Last reviewed . By the PeptIQ team.

Observational reporting only — not medical advice. Does not recommend doses, protocols, or treatments.

LL-37

6 community reports

Overall experience

From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Favorable 100% · Mixed 0% · Unfavorable overall 0%

Most reported benefits

Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.

Recovery
6

Self-reported dose per injection

Median bucket: 100–200 mcg · Most common: 100–200 mcg

Reports span 100–400 mcg

100–200
4
200–400
2

Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.

Commonly stacked with

NAD+

96 community reports

Overall experience

From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Favorable 2% · Mixed 98% · Unfavorable overall 0%

Most reported benefits

Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.

Energy
197
Appetite
197

Most logged side effects

Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Headache
66
Nausea
64
Injection site irritation
64

Self-reported dose per injection

Median bucket: 5+ mg · Most common: 5+ mg

Reports span 0.1 to ≥ 5 mg (open-ended top bucket)

0.1–0.2 mg
2
0.2–0.4 mg
17
0.4–0.6 mg
8
0.6–1 mg
1
1–2 mg
2
3–5 mg
2
5+ mg
165

Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.

How repeat users are trending

Among repeat reporters, 95% said they felt similar to their last entry, 5% more positive, and 0% more negative.

Overall, repeat reporters leaned more positive than their previous entry.

Median gap between entries: 51 days · Based on 42 repeat reporters

Sources (13)

Published sources linked on the LL-37 and NAD+ wiki pages.

  1. PubMed

    LL-37, the only human member of the cathelicidin family of antimicrobial peptides

    Vandamme D, Landuyt B, Luyten W, et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  2. PubMed

    The antimicrobial peptide LL-37 inhibits biofilm formation

    Dean SN, Bishop BM, van Hoek ML. BMC Microbiol. 2011

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  3. PubMed

    Rosacea: Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Correlates

    Geng RSQ, Bourkas AN, Mufti A, et al. Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery. 2024

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  4. PubMed

    LL-37 antimicrobial peptide: Molecular characterisation and its role in oral health and disease-A narrative review

    Soman D, P J, Cm M, et al. Archives of oral biology. 2026

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  5. PubMed

    NAD+ metabolism and its roles in cellular processes during ageing

    Covarrubias AJ, Perrone R, Grozio A, et al. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  6. PubMed

    Safety and efficacy of NAD+ supplementation: a systematic review

    Reiten OK, Wilvang MA, Mitchell SJ, et al. J Clin Invest. 2021

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  7. PubMed

    NAD+ intermediates: The biology and therapeutic potential

    Yoshino J, Baur JA, Imai SI. Cell Metab. 2018

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  8. PubMed

    Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide in Aging Biology: Potential Applications and Many Unknowns

    Bhasin S, Seals D, Migaud M, et al. Endocrine reviews. 2023

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  9. PubMed

    The Safety and Antiaging Effects of Nicotinamide Mononucleotide in Human Clinical Trials: an Update

    Song Q, Zhou X, Xu K, et al. Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2023

    Source
    Wiki study page →