Compare

Cagrilintide vs LL-37

Side-by-side observational reports from PeptIQ users. This compares self-reported patterns — not clinical head-to-head trials.

Last reviewed . By the PeptIQ team.

Observational reporting only — not medical advice. Does not recommend doses, protocols, or treatments.

Cagrilintide

29 community reports

Overall experience

From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Favorable 98% · Mixed 2% · Unfavorable overall 0%

Most reported benefits

Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.

Appetite
139

Most logged side effects

Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Nausea
1
Digestive upset
1
Injection site irritation
1

Self-reported dose per injection

Median bucket: 2+ mg · Most common: 2+ mg

Reports span 0 to ≥ 2 mg (open-ended top bucket)

0–0.025 mg
41
0.2–0.4 mg
9
0.4–0.6 mg
2
0.6–1 mg
3
1–2 mg
1
2+ mg
83

Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.

How repeat users are trending

Among repeat reporters, 87% said they felt similar to their last entry, 13% more positive, and 0% more negative.

Overall, repeat reporters leaned more positive than their previous entry.

Median gap between entries: 142 days · Based on 23 repeat reporters

LL-37

6 community reports

Overall experience

From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Favorable 100% · Mixed 0% · Unfavorable overall 0%

Most reported benefits

Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.

Recovery
6

Self-reported dose per injection

Median bucket: 100–200 mcg · Most common: 100–200 mcg

Reports span 100–400 mcg

100–200
4
200–400
2

Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.

Commonly stacked with

Sources (9)

Published sources linked on the Cagrilintide and LL-37 wiki pages.

  1. PubMed

    Cagrilintide, a long-acting amylin analogue, for the treatment of obesity

    Lau DCW, Erondu N, Skovgaard D, et al. Lancet. 2022

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov

    Cagrilintide obesity studies on ClinicalTrials.gov

    ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical trial registry. 2024

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  3. PubMed

    Cagrilintide: A Long-Acting Amylin Analog for the Treatment of Obesity

    D'Ascanio AM, Mullally JA, Frishman WH. Cardiology in review. 2024

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  4. PubMed

    Coadministered Cagrilintide and Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity

    Garvey WT, Blüher M, Osorto Contreras CK, et al. The New England journal of medicine. 2025

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  5. PubMed

    LL-37, the only human member of the cathelicidin family of antimicrobial peptides

    Vandamme D, Landuyt B, Luyten W, et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  6. PubMed

    The antimicrobial peptide LL-37 inhibits biofilm formation

    Dean SN, Bishop BM, van Hoek ML. BMC Microbiol. 2011

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  7. PubMed

    Rosacea: Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Correlates

    Geng RSQ, Bourkas AN, Mufti A, et al. Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery. 2024

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  8. PubMed

    LL-37 antimicrobial peptide: Molecular characterisation and its role in oral health and disease-A narrative review

    Soman D, P J, Cm M, et al. Archives of oral biology. 2026

    Source
    Wiki study page →