Compare

LL-37 vs TB-500 Fragment

Side-by-side observational reports from PeptIQ users. This compares self-reported patterns — not clinical head-to-head trials.

Last reviewed . By the PeptIQ team.

Observational reporting only — not medical advice. Does not recommend doses, protocols, or treatments.

LL-37

6 community reports

Overall experience

From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Favorable 100% · Mixed 0% · Unfavorable overall 0%

Most reported benefits

Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.

Recovery
6

Self-reported dose per injection

Median bucket: 100–200 mcg · Most common: 100–200 mcg

Reports span 100–400 mcg

100–200
4
200–400
2

Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.

Commonly stacked with

TB-500 Fragment

26 community reports

Overall experience

From check-in ratings — separate from side effects logged below. Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Favorable 3% · Mixed 97% · Unfavorable overall 0%

Most reported benefits

Benefits users selected when logging a favorable or mixed check-in.

Recovery
176

Most logged side effects

Side effects are logged separately from overall experience. A favorable check-in can still include nausea, fatigue, or injection-site reactions.

Injection site irritation
171

Self-reported dose per injection

Median bucket: 2+ mg · Most common: 2+ mg

Reports span 1 to ≥ 2 mg (open-ended top bucket)

1–2 mg
59
2+ mg
117

Anonymized self-reports from PeptIQ users — not prescribing guidance. Buckets group similar logged amounts; open-ended top buckets mean “at least” that dose.

How repeat users are trending

Among repeat reporters, 79% said they felt similar to their last entry, 21% more positive, and 0% more negative.

Overall, repeat reporters leaned more positive than their previous entry.

Median gap between entries: 188 days · Based on 24 repeat reporters

Sources (8)

Published sources linked on the LL-37 and TB-500 Fragment wiki pages.

  1. PubMed

    LL-37, the only human member of the cathelicidin family of antimicrobial peptides

    Vandamme D, Landuyt B, Luyten W, et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  2. PubMed

    The antimicrobial peptide LL-37 inhibits biofilm formation

    Dean SN, Bishop BM, van Hoek ML. BMC Microbiol. 2011

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  3. PubMed

    Rosacea: Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Correlates

    Geng RSQ, Bourkas AN, Mufti A, et al. Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery. 2024

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  4. PubMed

    LL-37 antimicrobial peptide: Molecular characterisation and its role in oral health and disease-A narrative review

    Soman D, P J, Cm M, et al. Archives of oral biology. 2026

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  5. PubMed

    Thymosin beta4: a multi-functional regenerative peptide (review)

    Goldstein AL, Kleinman HK. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  6. PubMed

    Thymosin beta 4 and wound healing: a multifunctional peptide

    Goldstein AL, Kleinman HK. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010

    Source
    Wiki study page →
  7. PubMed

    Safety and Efficacy of Approved and Unapproved Peptide Therapies for Musculoskeletal Injuries and Athletic Performance

    Mendias CL, Awan TM. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 2026

    Source
    Wiki study page →