@lydiathurstan.ifbbpro
3 posts audited · 14 claims analysed
Science credibility score
Based on 14 claims across 3 audits
4
Supported
29%
9
Overstated
64%
0
Misleading
0%
1
No Evidence
7%
Audit history(3 posts)
“NAD+ 💉🩸 Let’s discuss what it does and is it worth taking? #peptides #onlinecoach #health”
The claims about NAD predominantly align with established biochemical understanding, though some specific mechanistic assertions require additional clinical research. The underlying scientific concepts are fundamentally sound, with nuanced evidence supporting NAD's critical cellular roles.
“BPC + TB500 the injury repair stack to solve IT ALL! Let’s discuss what it really does and how they work. #bodybuilding #injury #nutritionist #peptides #bpc”
While BPC-157 shows promising preclinical results in tissue repair and healing mechanisms, the current scientific evidence lacks definitive human clinical validation. More research, particularly human trials, is needed to substantiate the broad claims of tissue repair and healing.
“GHK-CU the new MIRACLE beauty drug ! #peptides #ghk #bodybuilding #weightloss”
While GHK-Cu shows promising preclinical results in tissue regeneration and wound healing, the claims of it being a 'miracle' compound for beauty, bodybuilding, and weight loss are not supported by current scientific evidence. More rigorous human clinical trials are needed to substantiate these broad claims.
Audit another post from @lydiathurstan.ifbbpro
Paste their Instagram link to add a new audit