Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited July 28, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
62
Confidence
82%
Panels
1/7

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
RT202602
Issue date
2026-01-13

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this COA · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Purity

    Not on this COA · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    5.89 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • No purity testing

    This COA contains only endotoxin testing. No HPLC, mass spec, or other purity/identity analysis is present.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity verification method is documented.

  • Single-panel COA

    Only endotoxin testing (USP <85>) is performed. This is a partial COA, not a comprehensive analysis.

  • Batch number present

    Client SID RT202602 is documented.

  • No sample receipt date

    Only publication date (2026-01-13) is shown; no sample collection or receipt date is documented.

  • Lab information complete

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, contact info, and verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com with key 4KXSQQE4U289) is provided.

  • Professional presentation

    Document has proper signatures, QR code, and standard COA formatting.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.