Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
88
Confidence
92%
Panels
1/7

Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (1/7), and 1 soft concern. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
RP202601
Issue date
2025-12-22

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    9.5 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Endotoxin testing performed

    USP <85> bacterial endotoxin test shows 9.5 EU/mL with acceptable spike recovery (66%) and CV values. Result is below the stated USP limit of 5 EU/kg/hr for the dilution tested.

  • Limited scope report

    This COA is endotoxin-focused only. No purity, identity, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent panels are present on this document. This appears to be a split/supplemental report for endotoxin testing specifically (note '-ENDO' suffix in sample name). The vendor may have separate reports for other testing.

  • Established testing laboratory

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC is a known third-party analytical testing laboratory in Michigan with verifiable contact information and online verification system.

  • Clear batch identification

    Client SID RP202601 and internal sample ID SPL-2645 are clearly documented.

  • Recent publication date

    Published 2025-12-22, which is a valid date within normal business operations (before the current date of 2026-09-05).

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes QR code for verification, dual signatures (President and Managing Director), proper lab letterhead, and structured data presentation consistent with professional analytical reports.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.