Public COA audit
Retatrutide
Audited September 5, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 75%
- Panels
- 1/7
Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "Endotoxin-only report". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- APR-1105559
- Sample date
- 2026-03-15
- Issue date
- 2026-03-22
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
<0.05 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Endotoxin-only report
This COA only contains endotoxin testing results. No purity (HPLC), identity (MS), heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent/water panels are present on this document. This appears to be a split/supplemental report focused solely on endotoxin testing.
No purity data
No HPLC or other purity analysis is included in this report. Cannot assess compound purity from this document.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity verification method is documented. The compound is named but not analytically confirmed.
Lot number present
Lot number APR-1105559 is clearly stated and matches the client identifier.
Dates within valid range
Received date 2026-03-15 and analysis date 2026-03-22 are both on or before the current date (2026-09-05) and show reasonable turnaround time.
Lab verification needed
Horizon Analytical is named with contact email and website (horizonanalytical.com), but independent verification of this lab's accreditation and existence is recommended. QR code present but not validated in this audit.
Professional presentation
Document has clean formatting, proper headers, signature from Aleksey Yevtodiyenko PhD (Research and Formulation Chemist), and includes compound identifiers (CAS, PubChem CID, molecular formula, molecular weight).
Incomplete testing scope
For a research peptide, the absence of purity and identity testing on this particular report is a significant limitation. This document alone is insufficient to verify compound quality. A companion purity/identity COA should exist for this lot.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.