Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited September 5, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
85%
Panels
1/7

Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "Heavy metals only report". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
RTT202606
Issue date
2026-06-25

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    All ICH Class 1, 2a, 2b, 3 metals below limits; Barium 0.445 µg, Sodium 199 µg detected

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Heavy metals only report

    This COA contains ONLY heavy metals testing (EPA 208/245 methods for ICH elemental impurities). No identity confirmation (MS, NMR, HPLC), no purity/assay data, no endotoxin, no microbial, no sterility, no residual solvents/water. This is a partial/split report for one testing scope only.

  • No purity/assay data

    Document does not report peptide purity, HPLC chromatogram, or assay percentage. Cannot assess compound quality from this report alone.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, NMR, amino acid analysis, or other identity verification method present. Cannot confirm the sample is actually Retatrutide.

  • No sample/receipt date

    Document shows publish date 2026-06-25 but does not state when the sample was received or analyzed. Traceability is limited.

  • Lab contact information present

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC, Dorr MI, with phone, email, website, and verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com with key VWL6MYF3D8DS) provided. Lab appears to be a real entity.

  • Client lot number present

    Client SID RTT202606 and lab sample ID SPL-4095 both documented.

  • Professional formatting

    Document has consistent branding, QR code for verification, dual signatures (Ashlee Lust President, Joshua Lust Managing Director), and standard EPA method citations. Formatting is consistent with legitimate lab reports.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.