Public COA audit
BPC-157 · TB-500
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 1/7
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (1/7), 2 soft concerns, and notable note: "Endotoxin-only report". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- B-4339222-E
- Sample date
- 2026-06-12
- Issue date
- 2026-06-22
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
<0.05 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Endotoxin-only report
This is an endotoxin-scoped COA (lot suffix -E). The document explicitly tests only bacterial endotoxin (<0.05 EU/mL, passing). This does not indicate the vendor never ran purity/identity testing; those results may be in a separate report for this lot.
No purity or identity data in this file
This report contains no HPLC, MS, or other identity/purity panels. For a complete quality assessment, the corresponding purity/identity COA (likely lot B-4339222-P or similar) should also be reviewed.
Lab contact and verification provided
Horizon Analytical provides contact email ([email protected]) and states results are searchable via horizonanalytical.com. QR code present for validation.
Lot number clearly stated
Lot B-4339222-E is clearly printed and consistent throughout the document.
Dates are valid and logical
Lab received 2026-06-12, analysis conducted 2026-06-22. Both dates are on or before today (2026-09-05) and show a reasonable 10-day turnaround.
Minimal detail for endotoxin method
The report states 'validated testing methodologies' but does not specify LAL assay type (gel-clot, chromogenic, turbidimetric) or reference standard. More methodological transparency would strengthen confidence.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.