Public COA audit
Triple Agonist
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 93%
- Panels
- 5/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.79%
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, broad panel coverage (5/7), and 2 soft concerns.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CR-3XAG10-2605-1
- Identity method
- HPLC-RTM (retention time match)
- Sample date
- 2026-05-15
- Issue date
- 2026-05-24
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
5 of 7 present · 5 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 2 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.79%
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
All Not Detected (As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb)
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
NMT 0.05 EU/mL
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
No Growth
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity with conformity testing
99.79% purity confirmed across three conformity samples (mean 99.30%, std dev 0.35%), demonstrating batch consistency
Identity confirmed by HPLC-RTM
Triple Agonist confirmed via chromatographic retention time comparison with reference standard
Comprehensive testing panel
Full QC panel includes purity, identity, heavy metals (ICP-MS), sterility (PCR), endotoxin (USP <85>), and fentanyl screen
Clear batch identification
Lot CR-3XAG10-2605-1, COA-2026-DGN4QV, Accession ACC-2026-2645
Dates are consistent and current
Received 2026-05-15, analyzed 2026-05-20, issued 2026-05-24 - all dates are logical and within acceptable timeframes
ISO/IEC 17025 accredited lab
ILS Laboratories claims ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation with verification URL and QR code provided
Professional presentation
Well-formatted two-page report with chromatogram, conformity data, detailed methodology notes, and lab director signature
Microbial testing not included
Standard microbial panel (total aerobic count, yeast/mold) not present; only sterility PCR performed
Residual solvents/water content not tested
No Karl Fischer water content or residual solvent analysis reported
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.