Public COA audit

Tirzepatide

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
88%
Panels
1/7

Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (1/7), 2 soft concerns, and notable note: "Endotoxin-only report". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
TZ20250730
Sample date
2025-07-30
Issue date
2025-08-04

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    14.4 EU/mL

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Endotoxin-only report

    This COA is scoped exclusively to bacterial endotoxin testing (USP <85>). No identity, purity, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent panels are present on this document. This appears to be a split report for endotoxin testing only, which is common practice. A separate purity/identity COA may exist for this lot.

  • No explicit pass/fail stated

    The endotoxin result is 14.4 EU/mL with a stated USP limit of 5 EU/kg/hr, but no explicit pass/fail determination is provided. The relationship between the measured concentration and the limit depends on dosing parameters not shown on this report.

  • Verification URL provided

    Document includes verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com) with key DS2WWMJFCBA0 and QR code for independent verification.

  • Lab contact information complete

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address (1743 142nd Ave Suite 4, Dorr, MI 49323), phone (616-359-9023), email, and website provided.

  • Dates consistent and reasonable

    Client SID suggests sample date 2025-07-30, published 2025-08-04 (5-day turnaround). Both dates are before today (2026-09-05) and are reasonable.

  • Batch/lot number present

    Client SID TZ20250730 and internal Sample ID SPL-1469 both documented.

  • Professional formatting with signatures

    Document includes dual signatures (Ashlee Lust, President; Joshua Lust, Managing Director), professional layout, and lab branding.

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (397 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.