Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TES202605
- Issue date
- 2026-06-15
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Tested · passed
Sterility testing where applicable.
Pass
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Limited testing scope
This COA only reports sterility testing (USP <71>). No identity confirmation, purity analysis, heavy metals, endotoxin, or other typical peptide quality panels are included. While sterility-only COAs can be legitimate for specific testing requests, comprehensive peptide quality assessment typically requires multiple panels.
No identity confirmation
The document does not include any identity verification testing (e.g., mass spectrometry, HPLC retention time, amino acid analysis) to confirm the sample is actually Tesamorelin.
No purity data
No purity percentage or HPLC analysis is provided. For research peptides, purity determination is typically a core requirement.
No sample receipt date
The COA does not specify when the sample was received by the laboratory, only the publication date (2026-06-15).
Verification system provided
The COA includes a verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com) and unique key (AS4KWREUDTX2) for independent verification, which is a positive indicator of transparency.
Professional presentation
The document has professional formatting with clear sections, QR code, signatures from two different roles (President and Managing Director), and complete lab contact information.
Batch tracking present
Client SID (TES202605) and internal Sample ID (SPL-3948) are both documented for traceability.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.