Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TES202605
- Issue date
- 2026-05-28
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
<20.0 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Missing critical panels
This COA only reports endotoxin testing. No identity confirmation (MS, NMR, HPLC retention time), no purity analysis (HPLC), no heavy metals, no microbial testing, and no sterility testing are present. For a peptide intended for research or therapeutic use, identity and purity are fundamental requirements.
No purity data
No HPLC or other purity analysis is reported. Cannot verify the actual peptide content or assess impurity profile.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity confirmation method is reported. Cannot verify this is actually Tesamorelin.
Client SID present
Client sample ID TES202605 is clearly stated.
No sample receipt date
Only publication date (2026-05-28) is provided. No sample collection or receipt date documented.
Lab information complete
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, contact information, and verification URL provided. Lab appears to be a real entity based in Michigan.
Spike recovery below typical range
USP <85> spike recovery of 56% is below the typical acceptable range (50-200% per USP, but often 70-130% in practice). While the endotoxin result may still be valid, this suggests potential matrix interference or assay performance issues.
Professional presentation
Document has professional formatting with QR code, verification key, signatures from President and Managing Director, and clear layout.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.