Public COA audit

Tesamorelin

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.713%

Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), 2 soft concerns, and notable note: "High purity across all vials". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
TES202605
Identity method
HPLC retention time and spectral match
Issue date
2026-05-28

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    RT match 0.99-1.01, Spectral match 1000

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.713-99.887%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity across all vials

    All five vials show purity 99.7-99.9%, which is normal for research-grade peptides. Assay values 9.96-10.17 mg are consistent with labeled 10mg.

  • Identity confirmed by dual methods

    Both retention time (RT) and spectral matching performed, with RT ratios 0.99-1.01 and spectral scores of 1000 indicating positive identification.

  • Limited testing scope - purity/identity only

    This COA covers only purity and identity testing. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water panels are present in this report. This may be a purity-focused report; the vendor may have separate reports for other testing.

  • Issue date valid

    Published 2026-05-28, which is before the current date (2026-09-05).

  • No sample receipt or testing dates

    The COA shows only a publication date. No sample receipt date or testing date range is provided, making it difficult to assess turnaround time or sample age.

  • Lab information and verification provided

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, phone, email, website, and verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com with key LHKWFNWEY5QN) provided. Lab appears to be a real entity in Dorr, MI.

  • Batch/lot number present

    Client SID TES202605 serves as the batch identifier.

  • Professional formatting with signatures

    Document includes QR code, dual signatures (Ashlee Lust, President; Joshua Lust, Managing Director), and photo attachment of vials on page 2.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.