Public COA audit

Tesamorelin

Audited September 5, 2026

Incomplete documentation

Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.

Legitimacy
45
Confidence
85%
Panels
1/7

Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "Heavy metals only report". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
TES202603
Issue date
2026-04-03

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Purity

    Not on this certificate file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    All Class 1, 2a, 2b, 3 metals below limits; Barium 0.47550 µg, Sodium 15.000 µg detected

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • Heavy metals only report

    This COA contains ONLY heavy metals testing (EPA 208/245 methods). No identity confirmation (MS, NMR, amino acid analysis), no purity (HPLC), no endotoxin, no microbial, no sterility, no residual solvents/water. This is a partial/scoped report for heavy metals analysis only.

  • No purity data

    No HPLC, no purity percentage, no chromatogram. Cannot assess peptide purity from this document.

  • No identity confirmation

    No mass spectrometry, NMR, amino acid sequencing, or other identity verification method present. Cannot confirm this is actually Tesamorelin.

  • No sample receipt date

    Published date is 2026-04-03, but no sample receipt/collection date is shown. Cannot verify testing timeline.

  • Lab information present

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC, Dorr MI, with verification URL and key JA9M5N9736TR provided. Lab contact details and signatures from Ashlee Lust (President) and Joshua Lust (Managing Director) included.

  • Batch/lot identified

    Client SID TES202603, internal sample ID SPL-3356.

  • Scope limitation

    This appears to be a heavy metals-only report for Tesamorelin 10mg. The suffix 'HM' in the sample name suggests this is intentionally a heavy metals scope. Other testing (purity, identity, endotoxin) may exist in separate reports but are not in this file.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.