Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited September 5, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 1/7
Scored poorly because the file is incomplete or not a full COA, limited panel coverage (1/7), 3 critical findings, and notable note: "Heavy metals only report". To improve: upload the full certificate (or the matching sibling purity/endotoxin report) and include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TES202601
- Issue date
- 2026-01-19
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
All ICH Q3D Class 1, 2a, 2b, and 3 metals tested; all below limits or trace amounts detected
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Heavy metals only report
This COA contains ONLY heavy metals testing (EPA 208/245 methods for ICH Q3D elemental impurities). No identity confirmation (MS, NMR, amino acid analysis), no purity/HPLC, no endotoxin, no microbial, no sterility, and no residual solvent/water content testing is present in this document.
No purity data
No HPLC, LC-MS, or other purity analysis is included. Cannot assess peptide purity or related substances.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, NMR, amino acid analysis, or other identity confirmation method is present. Cannot verify this is actually Tesamorelin.
Scope-limited report
This appears to be a heavy-metals-only report for lot TES202601. The vendor may have issued separate reports for purity/identity and other panels (common practice with split testing). This file alone is insufficient for full peptide characterization.
Issue date valid
Published 2026-01-19, which is before today (2026-09-05). No sample/receipt date is printed.
Lab information present
TrustPointe Analytics LLC, Dorr MI, with verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com) and QR code. Lab contact details and dual signatures (Ashlee Lust, Joshua Lust) are present.
Batch/lot identified
Client SID TES202601, internal sample ID SPL-2740.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.