Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited July 28, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TES202601
- Issue date
- 2026-01-06
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · result on file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
11.0 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Purity testing absent
No HPLC or other purity analysis reported. This is a critical omission for peptide quality verification.
Identity testing absent
No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity confirmation method reported.
Single-panel COA
Only endotoxin testing performed. Missing identity, purity, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, and residual solvent panels that are standard for peptide COAs.
Endotoxin result interpretation unclear
Result of 11.0 EU/mL reported with USP limit reference of 5 EU/kg/hr, but no explicit pass/fail statement. The units differ (EU/mL vs EU/kg/hr), making direct comparison difficult without dosing context.
Batch number present
Client SID TES202601 provided for traceability.
Sample date missing
No sample collection or receipt date documented, only publication date.
Lab identification complete
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, contact information, and verification URL provided.
Verification system present
QR code and verification key (HPVLJXHMSNS4) at TrustPointeLIMS.com provided for authentication.
Professional presentation
Document has professional formatting with signatures from President and Managing Director.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.