Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.71%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TES202601
- Identity method
- HPLC with retention time (RT) and spectral matching
- Issue date
- 2026-01-06
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
RT match 1.00-1.02, Spectral match 1000
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.71% average across three vials
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed across three vials
Average purity 99.71% (range 99.699-99.713%) with consistent results across triplicate samples, which is normal for research-grade peptides
Identity confirmed by dual methods
Both retention time matching (1.00-1.02) and spectral analysis (1000 match score) confirm Tesamorelin identity
Batch number present
Client SID TES202601 clearly documented
Sample date not specified
COA shows publication date 2026-01-06 but no explicit sample collection or receipt date
Laboratory information complete
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full contact details, verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com), and verification key DKUBGCR943N7
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing documented
Professional presentation
Well-formatted COA with triplicate analysis, system suitability data (0.4% RSD), dual signatures, and photo attachment of tested vials
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.