Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 1/7
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (1/7), 2 soft concerns, and notable note: "Endotoxin testing present". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TS20250722
- Issue date
- 2025-08-20
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
<5.00 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Endotoxin testing present
USP <85> bacterial endotoxin test performed with result <5.00 EU/mL, meeting USP limit of 5 EU/kg/hr. Spike recovery 66% and spike CV 5.3% documented.
Limited scope report
This is an endotoxin-only report (note '-ENDO' suffix in sample name). No purity, identity, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent testing included in this specific document. This may be part of a split testing approach where other panels are reported separately.
Verification system provided
Document includes verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com) with key 7NLXZBQM0326 and QR code for independent verification.
Known testing laboratory
TrustPointe Analytics LLC is a recognized third-party testing laboratory in Dorr, Michigan with documented contact information and web presence.
Publication date reasonable
Published date 2025-08-20 is within normal range (before current date 2026-09-05).
Batch identifier present
Client SID TS20250722 provided, appears to encode date (2025-07-22) consistent with publication timeline.
Professional presentation
Document shows proper formatting with lab branding, signatures from President and Managing Director, and standard COA structure.
No purity data in this report
This endotoxin-focused report does not include HPLC purity or identity confirmation. Users should verify a companion purity/identity COA exists for this lot.
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (381 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.