Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited July 28, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 62
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TS20250722
- Issue date
- 2025-08-20
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
<5.00 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Missing critical panels
This COA only reports endotoxin testing. No identity confirmation (MS, NMR, HPLC retention time), no purity analysis (HPLC), no heavy metals, no microbial limits, no sterility, and no residual solvents/water content. A complete peptide COA should include at minimum identity and purity.
No purity data
No HPLC or other purity measurement is provided. Cannot assess compound quality or concentration.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity verification method is reported. Cannot confirm the sample is actually Tesamorelin.
Batch/lot number present
Client SID TS20250722 is provided as batch identifier.
No sample receipt date
Published date is 2025-08-20, but no sample collection or receipt date is documented.
Lab information complete
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full contact details, verification URL, and QR code provided. Lab appears to be a real entity based in Michigan.
Endotoxin testing performed
USP <85> bacterial endotoxin test shows <5.00 EU/mL with acceptable spike recovery (66%) and CV values. This is appropriate for injectable peptides.
Professional presentation
Document has professional formatting with signatures, QR code verification, and proper lab letterhead.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.