Public COA audit
BPC-157 · TB-500
Audited July 28, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- BB202604
- Issue date
- 2026-03-26
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
<5.05 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity testing
This COA contains only endotoxin testing. No HPLC or other purity analysis is present, which is essential for peptide quality verification.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, or other identity verification method is documented. Cannot confirm the sample is actually BPC-157/TB-500.
Single-panel COA
Only endotoxin testing performed. While endotoxin testing is valuable, a comprehensive COA for injectable peptides typically includes identity, purity, and additional safety panels.
No sample collection date
The COA shows a publication date (2026-03-26) but does not specify when the sample was collected or received by the laboratory.
Lab information present
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full contact details, verification URL, and unique key (R39EH9K2JTNZ) provided.
Batch number documented
Client SID BB202604 clearly stated.
Endotoxin test passed
USP <85> Bacterial Endotoxin test shows <5.05 EU/mL with acceptable spike recovery (109%) and CV values, meeting USP limit of 5 EU/kg/hr.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.