Public COA audit
BPC-157 · TB-500
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.64%
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), and 2 soft concerns. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- BB202604
- Identity method
- HPLC with retention time (RT) and spectral matching
- Issue date
- 2026-03-27
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
BPC-157 ID by RT=1.00, ID by Spectral=1000; TB-500 ID by RT=1.00, ID by Spectral=1000
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.565-99.680% across 4 vials
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity blend confirmed
HPLC purity 99.565-99.680% across four vials is excellent and consistent for research-grade peptide blends.
Dual-peptide identity confirmed
Both BPC-157 and TB-500 confirmed by retention time and spectral matching across all four vials with perfect scores (1.00 RT, 1000 spectral).
Batch/lot number present
Client SID BB202604 clearly stated.
Sample date not stated
Published date is 2026-03-27, but no explicit sample receipt or collection date is provided.
Lab contact and verification details provided
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, phone, email, website, and verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com, Key=HNYYJXP6A47F) plus QR code.
Purity/identity-scoped report
This COA focuses on purity, assay, and identity testing. Heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, and residual solvent/water panels are not present in this document. This is common for purity-focused reports; additional safety panels may exist in separate documents.
Professional formatting with signatures and photo attachment
Document includes dual approvals (Ashlee Lust, President; Joshua Lust, Managing Director) with signatures, and a photo attachment of the tested vials.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.