Public COA audit
TB500 · TB4
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 88
- Confidence
- 92%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.676%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- TB20250614
- Identity method
- HPLC retention time and spectral match
- Issue date
- 2025-07-17
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
RT=1.00, Spectral=1000
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.676%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
HPLC purity of 99.676% is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides
Identity confirmed by dual methods
Both retention time (RT=1.00) and spectral match (1000) confirm TB-500 identity
Batch number present
Batch TB20250614 clearly documented
Publication date documented
Published 2025-07-17, which is before the current date of 2026-07-28
Laboratory identified with contact details
TrustPointe Analytics LLC, Dorr MI, with phone, email, and website provided
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing
Professional presentation
Clean layout with QR code for verification, dual signatures, and sample photo attachment
Assay quantity documented
Actual assay result of 11.618 mg documented (labeled as 10mg vial, 116% recovery is within normal variance)
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (376 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.