Public COA audit

SS-31

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.83%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
SS202601
Identity method
HPLC retention time and spectral match
Issue date
2026-04-03

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    1.00 RT match, 1000 spectral match

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.812-99.852%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity across all samples

    Four vials tested with purity ranging 99.812-99.852%, consistent with high-quality research peptide synthesis

  • Dual identity confirmation

    Identity confirmed by both retention time (1.00) and spectral match (1000) for all samples

  • Multiple vial testing

    Four separate vials from the same batch tested (SPL-3436, SPL-3436-S01, SPL-3436-S02, SPL-3436-S03), showing consistency

  • Recent publication date

    Published 2026-04-03, within normal timeframe relative to current date 2026-07-29

  • Verification system provided

    QR code and verification key (AW5JVHZ9W4RN) provided for online verification at TrustPointeLIMS.com

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity panels performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing

  • Professional presentation

    Well-formatted COA with clear results table, signatures, contact information, and sample photograph attachment

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.