Public COA audit
Semaglutide
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 85%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.34%
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), 3 soft concerns, and notable note: "High HPLC purity reported". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- SM20250801
- Identity method
- HPLC (RT and Spectral)
- Issue date
- 2025-08-20
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 2 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · result on file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID by RT: 1.01, ID by Spectral: 1000
Purity
Tested · result on file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.340%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High HPLC purity reported
99.34% purity is within normal range for research-grade peptides and is not inherently suspicious.
Identity confirmation by dual HPLC methods
Both retention time (RT=1.01) and spectral match (1000) provided for identity verification.
Batch/lot number present
Client SID SM20250801 clearly stated.
No sample receipt/collection date
Only publication date (2025-08-20) is provided; no explicit sample receipt or testing date documented.
Lab contact information complete
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, phone, email, and website provided.
Verification system referenced
Document includes verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com) and unique key (NRSAG2BZA383) for third-party validation.
Limited testing scope
This COA covers only purity and identity testing (TM-1002 method). No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water panels are present in this report. This may be a purity/identity-scoped report only.
Professional presentation
Document includes lab branding, QR code, dual signatures (President and Managing Director), and sample photo attachment.
No explicit pass/fail criteria
Results are reported numerically but without stated acceptance criteria or explicit pass/fail designations for any test.
Timing & next steps
Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.
coa age
This COA was issued over a year ago (381 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.