Public COA audit

Retatrutide

Audited July 28, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
88
Confidence
87%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.66%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
SPL-2647
Identity method
HPLC (Retention Time and Spectral Match)
Issue date
2025-12-22

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    RT=1.00, Spectral=1000

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.62-99.72%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity across triplicate samples

    Three vials tested with purity values 99.646%, 99.624%, and 99.723% — consistent and within expected range for research peptides

  • Dual identity confirmation

    Both retention time (RT=1.00) and spectral match (1000) confirm identity across all samples

  • Triplicate testing performed

    Three separate vials (SPL-2647, SPL-2647-S01, SPL-2647-S02) tested with consistent results

  • Issue date within valid range

    Published 2025-12-22, which is before the current date of 2026-07-28

  • Established testing laboratory

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC is a known peptide testing facility in Michigan with verification system

  • Verification key provided

    QR code and verification key (F4ZBPO7C0D5A) at TrustPointeLIMS.com for independent verification

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity panels performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing

  • No sample receipt date

    COA does not specify when the sample was received by the laboratory

  • Professional presentation

    Clean layout with dual signatures, contact information, and photo attachment of tested vials

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.