Public COA audit
Retatrutide
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 83%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.62%
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), 3 soft concerns, and notable note: "High purity across all three vials". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- RP202601
- Identity method
- HPLC (RT and Spectral)
- Issue date
- 2025-12-22
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID by RT: 0.99-1.00; ID by Spectral: 1000
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.600-99.633%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity across all three vials
Purity values of 99.600%, 99.619%, and 99.633% are consistent and within normal range for research-grade peptides.
Identity confirmed by dual methods
Both retention time (RT) and spectral matching confirm identity across all three samples.
Client SID provided
Client sample ID RP202601 is clearly stated.
Issue date within acceptable range
Published date of 2025-12-22 is before the current date of 2026-09-05.
No sample receipt or collection date
The COA does not specify when the sample was received or collected by the laboratory.
Lab contact information provided
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, phone, email, and verification URL.
Verification key provided
QR code and verification key (HBUPKDUJD7C5) at TrustPointeLIMS.com allow independent verification.
Limited testing scope - purity/identity only
This COA covers only purity and identity testing (TM-1004 method). No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water testing is included in this report. This may be a purity-scoped report only; other safety panels may exist in separate documents.
Professional formatting with signatures
Document includes signatures from Ashlee Lust (President) and Joshua Lust (Managing Director), professional layout, and sample photo attachment.
Assay values exceed labeled amount
Labeled as '24mg' but assay results show 28-31mg per vial. This could indicate overfill (common practice) or labeling discrepancy.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.