Public COA audit
Retatrutide
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 83%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.33%
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), 3 soft concerns, and notable note: "High purity HPLC results". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- RP20251020
- Identity method
- HPLC retention time and spectral match (TM-1004)
- Issue date
- 2025-11-10
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
RT match 1.00, Spectral match 1000
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.332%, 99.337%, 99.319% across three samples
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity HPLC results
Three samples tested at 99.319-99.337% purity by HPLC (TM-1004), with good system suitability (0.6% RSD). This is normal for research-grade peptides.
Identity confirmed by dual methods
Retention time (RT) match 1.00 and spectral match 1000 for all three samples, indicating proper identity confirmation.
Triplicate testing performed
Three separate vials (SPL-2238, SPL-2238-S01, SPL-2238-S02) tested with consistent results, demonstrating batch homogeneity.
Issue date within acceptable range
Published 2025-11-10, which is before the current date of 2026-09-05.
Lab contact information provided
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address (Dorr, MI), phone, email, and website. Verification URL and QR code included.
Limited scope - purity/identity only
This COA covers only purity and identity testing (HPLC-based). No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water panels are present in this report. This may be a purity-focused report; other safety panels may exist in separate documents.
Sample date not stated
No explicit sample receipt or collection date is provided, only the publication date.
Minimal method detail
Method TM-1004 is referenced but no detailed methodology, acceptance criteria, or chromatogram is included on page 1. Page 2 shows only a photo attachment of vials, not analytical data.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.