Public COA audit
NAD+ · Unbuffered NAD+ 750mg
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 1/7
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (1/7), 2 soft concerns, and notable note: "Issue date valid". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- NDU202601
- Issue date
- 2026-01-28
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · result on file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
12.4 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Issue date valid
Published date 2026-01-28 is before current date 2026-09-05
Endotoxin testing present
USP <85> bacterial endotoxin test performed with result 12.4 EU/mL, including spike recovery (117%) and CV data (4.4% sample, 2.3% spike), indicating proper LAL assay validation
Limited scope report
This is an endotoxin-only report (note 'ENDO' suffix in sample name). Identity and purity testing are not included in this document. Client may have separate reports for those panels.
No explicit pass/fail stated
Result shows 12.4 EU/mL with USP limit reference of 5 EU/kg/hr, but no clear pass/fail determination is printed. The limit appears to be dose-based rather than concentration-based, making interpretation unclear without additional context.
Verification system provided
Document includes verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com) and unique key (6ET3JZ34KAS7) for third-party validation
Dual approval signatures
Report signed by both President (Ashlee Lust) and Managing Director (Joshua Lust) with visible signatures
Batch/lot number present
Client SID NDU202601 and internal sample ID SPL-2932 both documented
Professional presentation
Document has consistent branding, QR code, proper contact information, and structured layout typical of legitimate analytical lab reports
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.