Public COA audit
Klow
Audited July 29, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- KW202602
- Issue date
- 2026-05-24
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 0 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · result on file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
Multiple elements tested via EPA 208/245 methods; most below detection limits
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity analysis
This COA contains only heavy metals testing. No HPLC, MS, or other purity/identity analysis is present for the peptide compound.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, NMR, amino acid analysis, or other identity verification method is documented.
Limited scope - metals only
This report only covers elemental/heavy metals analysis. For a peptide product, absence of purity, identity, microbial, and endotoxin panels is a significant gap.
Batch/lot number present
Client SID KW202602 is documented.
No sample receipt/collection date
Only a publication date (2026-05-24) is provided; no sample collection or receipt date is documented.
Lab contact information provided
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, phone, email, and verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com with key ZDXCK95EUTPN).
Professional formatting with signatures
Document includes QR code, dual signatures (Ashlee Lust, President; Joshua Lust, Managing Director), and consistent branding.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.