Public COA audit
Ipamorelin
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.65%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- IP20250721
- Identity method
- HPLC (Retention Time and Spectral Match)
- Issue date
- 2025-08-14
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
RT=1.00, Spectral=1000
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.658% (SPL-1580-S01), 99.643% (SPL-1580)
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
HPLC purity of 99.658% and 99.643% for two samples is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides. System suitability (0.1% RSD) indicates reliable instrumentation.
Identity confirmed by dual methods
Both retention time (RT=1.00) and spectral match (1000) confirm Ipamorelin identity. Coelution control (999) indicates no interference.
Batch number present
Client SID IP20250721 clearly documented.
Sample date not explicitly stated
Published date is 2025-08-14, but no separate sample collection or receipt date is documented on the COA.
Lab information complete
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full contact details, verification URL, and unique key (4NJICVVG4B7F) provided. Dual signatures (President and Managing Director) present.
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing documented. This is common for basic peptide COAs but limits comprehensive quality assurance.
Professional presentation
Clean layout with QR code, dual sample results (SPL-1580-S01 and SPL-1580), photo attachment of vials, and proper footer information. Consistent with legitimate lab reporting.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.