Public COA audit
Ipamorelin · CJC-1295 (No DAC)
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.93%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CJIP202605
- Identity method
- HPLC with retention time (RT) and spectral matching
- Issue date
- 2026-05-14
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID by RT: 1.00, ID by Spectral: 1000 (both compounds)
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.929-99.938%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity blend confirmed
Five vials tested with purity range 99.929-99.938%, consistent across samples. Assay values for both peptides are within expected range (Ipamorelin: 9.379-9.573 mg, CJC-1295: 10.065-10.459 mg per 10mg nominal).
Identity confirmed by dual methods
Both peptides identified by retention time (RT=1.00) and spectral matching (1000 score) across all five samples. Coelution controls and system suitability tests passed.
Batch number present
Client SID: CJIP202605. Lab sample IDs: SPL-3789 series (SPL-3789-S01 through SPL-3789-S04).
Sample date not stated
Published date is 2026-05-14, but no explicit sample collection or receipt date is provided on the COA.
Lab information complete
TrustPointe Analytics LLC, 1743 142nd Ave Suite 4, Dorr, MI 49323. Contact: 616-359-9023, [email protected]. Verification URL and QR code provided (Key=FXJFWJRK8QNQ).
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water testing reported. This is common for basic peptide purity testing but limits comprehensive quality assurance.
Professional presentation
Document includes signatures (Ashlee Lust, President; Joshua Lust, Managing Director), photo attachment of tested vials, and structured data table. Formatting is consistent with professional lab reports.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.