Public COA audit
Ipamorelin · CJC-1295
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 88
- Confidence
- 87%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.84%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- CI20250805
- Identity method
- HPLC with retention time (RT) and spectral matching
- Issue date
- 2025-09-11
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
RT match 1.00, Spectral match 999-1000
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.839-99.864%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
Blend purity 99.84-99.86% across three vials, consistent with research-grade peptides
Identity confirmed by dual methods
Both compounds identified via retention time (1.00) and spectral matching (999-1000), with coelution controls and system suitability checks
Batch number present
Client SID CI20250805 clearly stated
Sample date not stated
Published date 2025-09-11 is present, but no explicit sample collection or receipt date documented
Lab information complete
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, contact details, verification URL and QR code provided
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing documented
Professional presentation
Well-formatted report with signatures, photo attachment of samples, and verification key
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.