Public COA audit

BPC-157 · TB-500

Audited July 29, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
92
Confidence
88%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.735%

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
BB202605
Identity method
HPLC with retention time (RT) and spectral matching
Issue date
2026-05-14

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    RT match 1.00, Spectral match 999-1000

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.712-99.772%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this COA

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Microbial

    Not on this COA

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this COA · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Sterility

    Not on this COA

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this COA

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing

Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity blend

    Five vials tested with purity ranging 99.712-99.772%, consistent across samples. This is normal for research-grade peptides.

  • Dual identity confirmation

    Both BPC-157 and TB-500 confirmed by retention time (1.00) and spectral matching (999-1000 scores), with coelution controls and system suitability checks (0.3-0.5% RSD).

  • Batch number present

    Client SID BB202605 clearly stated.

  • Sample date not stated

    Published date is 2026-05-14, but no explicit sample collection or receipt date is provided.

  • Lab details and verification

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address (Dorr, MI), phone, email, website, and verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com) with key 6ZBZCESBL7L9. QR code present.

  • Limited testing scope

    Only identity and purity panels performed. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing. This is common for basic peptide COAs but limits safety assurance.

  • Professional presentation

    Clean layout with signatures from Ashlee Lust (President) and Joshua Lust (Managing Director), attachment photo of vials, multi-sample analysis (5 vials), and method codes (TM-1006).

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.