Public COA audit
BPC-157 · TB-500
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.735%
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), and 2 soft concerns. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- BB202605
- Identity method
- HPLC with retention time (RT) and spectral matching
- Issue date
- 2026-05-14
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
BPC-157 ID by RT=1.00, ID by Spectral=999-1000; TB-500 ID by RT=1.00, ID by Spectral=1000
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.712-99.772%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity blend
Five vials tested with purity ranging 99.712-99.772%, consistent across samples. High purity is normal for research peptides and not a red flag.
Dual peptide identity confirmed
Both BPC-157 and TB-500 confirmed by retention time (RT=1.00) and spectral matching (scores 999-1000) across all five vials.
Multi-vial testing
Five individual vials from lot BB202605 tested (SPL-3799, SPL-3799-S01 through S04), showing consistency in assay and purity.
No sample receipt date
Published date is 2026-05-14, but no sample receipt or testing start date is provided.
Verification system provided
Document includes verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com) with key 6ZBZCESBL7L9 and QR code for independent verification.
Purity/identity scope only
This COA covers purity and identity testing only. No endotoxin, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent panels are present in this report. This is common for purity-focused testing but users should verify if additional safety testing exists separately.
Professional presentation
Document includes signatures from President (Ashlee Lust) and Managing Director (Joshua Lust), photo attachment of tested vials, and complete lab contact information.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.