Public COA audit

BPC-157 · TB-500

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.519%

Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), 2 soft concerns, and notable note: "High purity blend". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
BB20250630
Identity method
HPLC with retention time (RT) and spectral matching
Issue date
2025-07-17

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    BPC-157 ID by RT: 1.00, ID by Spectral: 1000; TB-500 ID by RT: 1.00, ID by Spectral: 1000

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.519%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity blend

    99.519% purity for BPC-157/TB-500 blend is excellent and within normal range for research peptides.

  • Dual compound identity confirmed

    Both BPC-157 and TB-500 confirmed by retention time (1.00) and spectral matching (1000), with system suitability controls (0.3% and 1.1% RSD) and coelution controls (999) indicating robust analytical method.

  • Assay quantification provided

    BPC-157: 11.51 mg, TB-500: 11.641 mg per vial, close to labeled 10mg/10mg amounts (within typical overfill range).

  • Limited testing scope

    This COA covers identity and purity only. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent/water testing is present on this report. This may be a purity-focused report; additional safety panels may exist in separate documents.

  • No sample receipt or testing date

    Only publication date (2025-07-17) is provided. Sample receipt date and testing completion date are not stated, making timeline verification difficult.

  • Lab contact information provided

    TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address (Dorr, MI), phone, email, and website. QR code for verification present.

  • Batch and sample ID documented

    Client batch BB20250630, lab sample ID SPL-1319, with photo attachment of physical vials.

  • Professional presentation

    Two-page report with signatures from President (Ashlee Lust) and Managing Director (Joshua Lust), photo attachment of tested samples, consistent branding.

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (415 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.