Public COA audit
BPC-157
Audited July 28, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.992%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- BP20250808
- Identity method
- HPLC retention time and spectral match
- Sample date
- 2025-08-08
- Issue date
- 2025-09-05
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
RT=1.00, Spectral=1000
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.992%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity confirmed
HPLC purity of 99.992% and 99.997% for duplicate samples is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides
Identity confirmed by dual methods
Both retention time (RT=1.00) and spectral match (1000) confirm BPC-157 identity
Batch number present
Client SID BP20250808 clearly documented
Dates consistent
Sample date 2025-08-08, published 2025-09-05 (28-day turnaround is reasonable)
Lab information complete
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full contact details, verification URL, and QR code provided
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels performed; no heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing
Duplicate analysis performed
Two samples (SPL-1689-S01 and SPL-1689) tested with consistent results, demonstrating analytical rigor
Professional presentation
Well-formatted COA with signatures, photo attachment of samples, and verification key
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.