Public COA audit
BPC-157
Audited July 28, 2026
Missing panels or key metadata — not enough evidence to treat this as a full certificate.
- Legitimacy
- 45
- Confidence
- 82%
- Panels
- 1/7
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- BP202512
- Issue date
- 2026-01-08
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this COA · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Purity
Not on this COA · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Heavy metals
Tested · passed
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
All tested metals below detection limits or within acceptable ranges
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
No purity testing
COA contains only heavy metals testing. No HPLC, MS, or other purity/identity analysis is present for the peptide compound.
No identity confirmation
No mass spectrometry, NMR, or other identity verification method is documented. Cannot confirm the sample is actually BPC-157.
Limited scope - metals only
This COA only reports heavy metals testing (EPA 208/245 methods). Missing all core peptide quality panels: purity, identity, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, and residual solvents/water content.
Lab information present
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full contact details, verification URL (TrustPointeLIMS.com), and verification key SYZBBWX299BZ provided.
Batch/lot documented
Client SID BP202512 and Sample ID SPL-2680 are clearly stated.
No sample collection date
Published date is 2026-01-08, but no sample collection or receipt date is documented.
Professional presentation
Document has professional formatting with QR code, signatures from Ashlee Lust (President) and Joshua Lust (Managing Director), and clear tabular results.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.