Public COA audit
BPC-157
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 92
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.46%
Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), and 2 soft concerns. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- BP202512
- Identity method
- HPLC retention time and spectral match
- Issue date
- 2025-12-29
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID by RT: 1.00; ID by Spectral: 1000
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
99.433-99.490%
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Not on this certificate file · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High purity across all three vials
All three tested vials show purity >99.4% by HPLC, which is normal and expected for research-grade peptides
Identity confirmed by dual methods
BPC-157 identity verified by both retention time (RT) and spectral match with reference standards
Multiple vials tested from same lot
Three separate vials (SPL-2682, SPL-2682-S01, SPL-2682-S02) tested showing consistent results across the batch
Issue date is valid
Published date 2025-12-29 is before the current date 2026-09-05
Lab contact information and verification provided
TrustPointe Analytics LLC with full address, phone, email, website, and LIMS verification key (WVL6HW4D89C4)
Limited testing scope - purity/identity only
This COA covers purity and identity testing only. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, sterility, or residual solvent testing is included in this report. This may be a purity-focused report with other safety panels potentially tested separately.
Professional formatting with signatures and photo attachment
Document includes dual approvals (President and Managing Director signatures), QR code for verification, and photo attachment of tested vials
No sample receipt or collection date specified
COA shows publication date but does not specify when samples were received or collected by the laboratory
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.