Public COA audit
BPC-157 · TB-500
Audited September 5, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 88%
- Panels
- 1/7
Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (1/7), 3 soft concerns, and notable note: "Endotoxin-only report". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- BB202512
- Issue date
- 2025-12-30
Original certificate
Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
1 of 7 present · 1 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 6 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Not on this certificate file · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Purity
Not on this certificate file · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Heavy metals
Not on this certificate file
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Microbial
Not on this certificate file
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
<10.0 EU/mL
Sterility
Not on this certificate file
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
Residual solvent / water
Not on this certificate file
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing on this file
Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
Endotoxin-only report
This COA is scoped to endotoxin testing only (USP <85>). The sample name includes 'ENDO' suffix. This appears to be a split report for lot BB202512; purity/identity testing may be documented in a separate file (e.g. with -P suffix). No identity, purity, heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent panels are present in this document.
No purity data in this file
This endotoxin-scoped report does not contain HPLC or purity percentage data. A separate purity COA should exist for this lot.
No identity confirmation in this file
No mass spec, NMR, or other identity verification is present in this endotoxin-focused report. Identity testing should be documented separately.
Established third-party lab
TrustPointe Analytics LLC is a known independent testing laboratory in Michigan with verifiable contact information and online presence.
Published date valid
Issue date 2025-12-30 is before the authoritative current date 2026-09-05 and is reasonable for a recent COA.
Client batch number present
Client SID BB202512 is clearly documented.
Endotoxin test passed with quality controls
USP <85> bacterial endotoxin result <10.0 EU/mL with spike recovery 107% and acceptable CV values (0.0% sample, 0.4% spike) indicates proper LAL assay execution and passing result.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.