Public COA audit

GLP-3 R · GLP3-R

Audited September 13, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
88%
Panels
6/7
Purity (printed)
99.8%

Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, broad panel coverage (6/7), 3 soft concerns, and notable note: "High HPLC purity". To improve: publish a complete, portal-verifiable certificate for this lot.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
Blue Cap
Identity method
HPLC-UV/VIS
Issue date
2026-07-06

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

6 of 7 present · 4 passed · 0 failed · 2 reported · 1 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · result on file · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    HPLC chromatogram shown

  • Purity

    Tested · result on file · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    >99.80% ± 0.18%

  • Heavy metals

    Tested · passed

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    Pb 0.01 ppm, As/Cd/Hg ND

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    <5.00 EU/mg

  • Sterility

    Tested · passed

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No Growth Detected

  • Residual solvent / water

    Tested · passed

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    All solvents ND, TFA <0.10%

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High HPLC purity

    Chromatographic purity >99.80% ± 0.18% is excellent and typical for research-grade peptides.

  • HPLC chromatograms present

    Multiple chromatograms shown across different lot tests, consistent with identity confirmation.

  • Informal lot numbering

    Lot number 'Blue Cap' (and variant 'Blue') is informal and non-standard. Professional labs typically use alphanumeric batch codes.

  • Multiple reports for same lot

    Document contains 3 separate COAs (V260616-7, V260423-7, V250929-1, V260629-18) all claiming lot 'Blue Cap' or 'Blue', tested on different dates (10/8/2025, 5/11/2026, 7/6/2026, 7/23/2026). This is unusual—typically one lot receives one comprehensive COA, not multiple separate reports over 9+ months.

  • Dates within valid range

    All issue dates (10/8/2025, 5/11/2026, 7/6/2026, 7/23/2026) are on or before today (2026-09-13) and are plausible.

  • A2LA accreditation claimed

    Lab references A2LA Certificate #6377.01.01 and displays ISO 17025:2017 accreditation badge.

  • Comprehensive testing suite

    Includes purity, identity, heavy metals, endotoxin (LAL), sterility (USP <71>), and residual solvents/TFA. No microbial count panel present.

  • Professional layout

    Consistent formatting, signatures, and disclaimers across all reports. Watermark 'LICENSED PEPTIDES' present.

  • Possible duplicate/retest scenario

    The presence of multiple COAs for the same informal lot number over a 9-month span is atypical. Could indicate retesting, batch splitting, or informal lot management—but raises questions about traceability.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.