Public COA audit

Tirzepatide

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
88
Confidence
92%
Panels
2/7
Purity (printed)
99.96%

Scored high because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (2/7), and 2 soft concerns. To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
SPL-3265
Identity method
HPLC retention time comparison and UV spectral match
Issue date
2026-03-12

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    RT match 1.00, Spectral match 1000

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.960%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    HPLC purity of 99.96% with assay of 33.684 mg in 30 mg vial (112% overfill typical for lyophilized peptides)

  • Identity confirmed by dual methods

    Both retention time (RT=1.00) and UV spectral match (1000) confirm tirzepatide identity

  • Established consumer testing lab

    Peptide Test (peptidetest.com) is a known consumer/group-buy testing service with TrustPointe LIMS verification system

  • Issue date valid

    Publish date 2026-03-12 is before today (2026-09-05)

  • Limited scope - purity/identity only

    This COA covers purity and identity testing only. No heavy metals, endotoxin, sterility, microbial, or residual solvent panels present. This is typical for consumer testing services but limits safety assessment.

  • No sample collection date

    COA shows publish date but no explicit sample receipt or collection date

  • Professional presentation

    Document includes QR code verification, dual signatures, photo of sample, detailed methodology explanations, and appropriate disclaimers for consumer testing scope

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.