Public COA audit

Tirzepatide

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
88%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
99.9%

Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (3/7), 4 soft concerns, and notable note: "High purity confirmed". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
2jx3cqq
Identity method
HPLC-UV-MS
Sample date
2026-06-04
Issue date
2026-06-15

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 1 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    ID Confirmed

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    >99.9%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · result on file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    2.5 EU

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Not on this certificate file

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity confirmed

    Chromatographic purity >99.9% by HPLC-UV/MS with clean chromatogram showing single dominant peak at ~7 minutes retention time

  • Mass spectral identity confirmed

    Mass spectrum shows expected m/z peaks (1613.4, 1606.1, 1216.0) consistent with Tirzepatide, ID confirmed by comparison to authentic standard

  • Batch/lot number present

    Lot 2jx3cqq clearly stated with vial photos showing matching lot number on label

  • Dates within normal range

    Sample received 2026-06-04, report issued 2026-06-15, testing dates 2026-06-06 to 2026-06-11 - all dates are consistent and on or before 2026-09-05

  • Branding inconsistency

    Document shows dual branding: header/footer say 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Finnrick.com' but signature block, methods page, and logo say 'Krause Analytical LLC' at 8127 Mesa Drive Suite B-206 Austin, TX 78759. This appears to be a reseller/white-label arrangement but creates verification ambiguity

  • Verification URL domain mismatch

    Verification URL is https://finnrick.com/verify but the actual testing lab is Krause Analytical LLC. Cannot independently verify if Finnrick is an authorized reseller or if Krause Analytical actually performed this test

  • Endotoxin testing performed

    Endotoxin result 2.5 EU (LOQ 0.5) by USP 86 LAL method on 2026-06-11. No explicit pass/fail stated but value is measurable and method is documented

  • Heavy metals method listed but no results

    Page 4 Methods Summary describes USP/NF 233 ICP-MS method for metals testing, but no metals results appear in the main COA table on page 1

  • Limited testing scope

    No microbial contamination testing, sterility testing, or residual solvent/water content testing performed or reported

  • Professional presentation

    Multi-page report with detailed chromatogram (page 2), mass spectrum (page 3), and methods summary (page 4). Includes vial photos, signature, and standard disclaimers

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.