Public COA audit

Thymosin Alpha-1 · Thymalfasin

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
72
Confidence
85%
Panels
5/7
Purity (printed)
99.6%

Scored moderately because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, broad panel coverage (5/7), 4 soft concerns, and notable note: "High HPLC purity". To improve: prefer labs with a public verification portal.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
2024010701
Identity method
Amino acid profile
Sample date
2024-01-07
Issue date
2024-01-07

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

5 of 7 present · 5 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 2 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Amino acid profile confirmed, specific rotation -110.0°

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    99.6%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Tested · passed

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    Aerobe <1000cfu/g, Mould & Yeast <100cfu/g

  • Endotoxin

    Tested · passed · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    <10EU/mg

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Tested · passed

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    Water 3.1%, Acetic acid 0.04%, acetonitrile <0.041%, dichloromethane <0.06%, N,N-Dimethylformamide <0.088%

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High HPLC purity

    99.6% purity by HPLC is excellent and normal for research-grade peptides

  • Comprehensive identity testing

    Amino acid profile with all expected residues confirmed, specific rotation within specification

  • Endotoxin testing present

    Bacterial endotoxin result <10EU/mg documented

  • Residual solvents tested

    Water content, acetic acid, and organic solvent residues all within specifications

  • No lab identification

    Document does not identify the testing laboratory name, address, or accreditation

  • No verification mechanism

    No URL, QR code, or reference number provided for independent verification

  • Watermark present

    Document contains a 'SAMPLE' watermark overlay, which may indicate this is a template or draft rather than a final issued COA

  • Retest date provided

    Retest date of 2026-01-06 is reasonable (2-year stability from production date)

  • Batch information complete

    Batch number, production date, and storage conditions clearly documented

  • Heavy metals not tested

    No heavy metals panel present in this report

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (972 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.