Public COA audit
Thymosin Alpha 1 · Thymosin α1
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 83%
- Panels
- 3/7
- Purity (printed)
- 99.9%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- 7xphgye
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS
- Sample date
- 2026-06-04
- Issue date
- 2026-06-15
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
>99.9%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Tested · passed · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
0.60 EU
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High chromatographic purity
HPLC purity >99.9% with clean chromatogram showing single dominant peak at ~6 min retention time
Mass spectral confirmation
MS data shows expected m/z peaks (1037.8, 778.7, 1556.2) consistent with Thymosin α1 charge states; ID confirmed
Unusual batch/lot format
Batch number '7xphgye' appears to be a random alphanumeric string rather than typical sequential or date-based lot numbering
Dual branding inconsistency
Document shows both 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Krause Analytical LLC' branding with different addresses (Finnrick.com vs 8127 Mesa Drive Austin TX); unclear relationship between entities
Verification URL domain mismatch
Verification URL points to finnrick.com but lab director signature is from Krause Analytical LLC
Limited testing scope
Only purity, identity, and endotoxin panels performed; no heavy metals, microbial, sterility, or residual solvent testing despite methods being described on page 4
Professional presentation
Document includes detailed chromatogram, mass spectrum, methods summary, and proper USP method references
Dates within normal range
Sample received 2026-06-04, testing 2026-06-10/11, report issued 2026-06-15 - all dates are sequential and reasonable
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.