Public COA audit

Tesamorelin

Audited September 5, 2026

Mostly consistent, with concerns

Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.

Legitimacy
68
Confidence
82%
Panels
3/7
Purity (printed)
98.7%

Scored lower because the document is mostly consistent but carries soft concerns, limited panel coverage (3/7), 4 soft concerns, and notable note: "High purity achieved". To improve: include identity, purity, and endotoxin at minimum and prefer labs with a public verification portal.

Document details

Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.

Batch / lot
2023052401-1
Identity method
HPLC
Sample date
2023-07-10
Issue date
2023-07-31

Original certificate

Embedded copy of the stored COA PDF or image. Download it for your records — PeptIQ’s audit is separate from the lab document itself.

Loading original certificate…

7-panel checklist

Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

3 of 7 present · 3 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 4 missing

Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.

  • Identity

    Tested · passed · core

    Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).

    Conform

  • Purity

    Tested · passed · core

    Reported purity percentage for the analyte.

    98.7%

  • Heavy metals

    Not on this certificate file

    Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Microbial

    Not on this certificate file

    Bioburden / microbial limits testing.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Endotoxin

    Not on this certificate file · core

    LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Sterility

    Not on this certificate file

    Sterility testing where applicable.

    No evidence on this file. Vendors sometimes publish separate purity and endotoxin reports for the same lot — check the brand page before treating this as “never tested.”

  • Residual solvent / water

    Tested · passed

    Residual solvents or water content limits.

    5.8% water, 6.0% acetic acid

How to read this

Had data · good

Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).

Had data · bad

Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.

Had data · unclear

Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.

Missing on this file

Not on this certificate file. Lowers file thoroughness; a sibling endotoxin/purity report for the same lot may still exist. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.

Findings

Evidence-linked observations from this audit.

  • High purity achieved

    98.7% peptide purity by HPLC with total impurities 1.3% and largest single impurity 0.9%, all within specifications

  • Identity confirmed

    Appearance and solubility conform to specifications; HPLC identity testing performed

  • No laboratory identification

    Document does not identify the testing laboratory name, address, accreditation, or contact information

  • No verification mechanism

    No URL, QR code, or other method provided to independently verify this COA with the issuing laboratory

  • Limited testing scope

    This COA covers purity and identity testing only. No heavy metals, microbial, endotoxin, or sterility testing is documented on this report

  • Batch information present

    Batch number 2023052401-1, production date 2023/07/10, survey date 2023/07/31

  • Dates are consistent

    Production date (2023-07-10) precedes survey date (2023-07-31); retest date (2025-07-09) is approximately 2 years from production

  • Generic formatting

    Document uses basic table layout without laboratory branding, letterhead, or distinctive formatting that would aid verification

Timing & next steps

Practical follow-ups based on document age and gaps.

  • coa age

    This COA was issued over a year ago (1132 days) — consider whether a retest is warranted for this batch.

PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.