Public COA audit
Tesamorelin
Audited July 29, 2026
Several fields check out, but we found issues worth reviewing before you rely on this document.
- Legitimacy
- 72
- Confidence
- 83%
- Panels
- 2/7
- Purity (printed)
- 98.29%
Document details
Fields extracted from the certificate — not order or payment data.
- Batch / lot
- udwf76c
- Identity method
- HPLC-UV-MS
- Sample date
- 2025-11-14
- Issue date
- 2025-11-25
7-panel checklist
Had data + good, had data + bad, reported without pass/fail, or missing. Missing lowers thoroughness — you decide whether that panel matters; PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
2 of 7 present · 2 passed · 0 failed · 0 reported · 5 missing
Missing is a thoroughness gap — not automatically bad. PeptIQ’s legitimacy score still weighs panel coverage; you can down-weight panels that don’t matter for your use case.
Identity
Tested · passed · core
Compound identity confirmed (e.g. HPLC, mass spec).
ID Confirmed
Purity
Tested · passed · core
Reported purity percentage for the analyte.
98.29%
Heavy metals
Not on this COA
Lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, or similar limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Microbial
Not on this COA
Bioburden / microbial limits testing.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Endotoxin
Not on this COA · core
LAL or chromogenic endotoxin assay.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Sterility
Not on this COA
Sterility testing where applicable.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
Residual solvent / water
Not on this COA
Residual solvents or water content limits.
No evidence for this panel. That lowers thoroughness — whether it matters depends on what you care about.
How to read this
Had data · good
Panel present with a pass (or clear acceptance).
Had data · bad
Panel present with a fail — a concrete quality signal.
Had data · unclear
Value reported without an explicit pass/fail mark.
Missing
Not on this certificate. Lowers thoroughness; you decide if that panel matters for your use case. PeptIQ’s score still factors coverage.
Findings
Evidence-linked observations from this audit.
High chromatographic purity
98.29% purity by HPLC-UV/MS is within normal range for research-grade peptides
Identity confirmed
Mass spectrum matches reference standard for Tesamorelin with characteristic m/z peaks at 644 and 735
Batch/lot number present
Lab # 130341, Test Certificate ID: udwf76c
Dates are consistent
Sample received 2025-11-14, tested 2025-11-21, report issued 2025-11-25 - all dates are logical and sequential
Dual branding inconsistency
Document shows both 'Finnrick Analytics' and 'Krause Analytical LLC' branding with different addresses and overlapping claims of ownership. Footer states '© 2026 Finnrick Analytics LLC' while signature is from 'Krause Analytical LLC'. This dual identity is unusual and raises questions about the actual testing entity.
Verification URL provided but not independently confirmed
URL https://finnrick.com/verify is listed but cannot be verified without external access
Limited testing scope
Only identity and purity panels performed. Methods summary mentions endotoxin and metals testing protocols but no results are reported for this sample.
Watermark and pagination inconsistencies
Heavy 'FINNRICK' watermark throughout. Page numbering shows 'Page 1 of 23' then 'Page 2 of 23' then 'Page 3 of 3' - inconsistent total page count is unusual.
PeptIQ COA reports analyze document content and publicly verifiable lab signals. They are educational and not a guarantee of product quality, legality, or safety. Always consult a qualified professional before making health decisions. We never publish purchase prices, shipping details, or uploader identity.